Film aesthetics and psychology

Film aesthetics and psychology


Basic information
The time of publication:2012-9
Press:Jiangsu literature and Art Publishing House
Author:(Law) Jean mitry (Mitry, J.)
Pages:481
Words:600000
Translator:Cui Junyan
BookTitle:Film aesthetics and psychology
Summary of contents
Jean Ditri (Jean
Mitry, 1907 - 1988), French film theorist: his two volume "film aesthetics and psychology" is one of the most important film theory history of academic works, earned him the nickname "the title of Hagel movies"; film historian: he completed the seven volume "film history" works; movie educator: from 1944 to donate any French Film School professor, established the earliest movie doctorate at University of Montreal; experimental film director: shooting on the visual rhythm experimental films; one of the founders of the French Film Archive; poet.
Cui Junyan, graduated from Beijing Foreign Studies University and a visiting scholar at the University of Paris, senior visiting scholar of Harvard University. Former editor in chief of China Film Association, China film press secretary. Vice president of China Film foundation. With translation: "modern film theory of information", "dictionary of film art" (one editor), "the film is what? "And" secular myth "," philosophy "and" understanding of movie film "(full version)," modern film aesthetics "and" film theory and criticism. ".
Author intro
The copyright page: in this language, image through its symbolic and logic and potential symbolic attribute of both words and vocabulary role. With the help of the language, it is no longer the abstract symbols in different degrees, but the use of reproducing reality, to obtain perceptual equivalents of the phenomena of the world. So, the reality is no longer by an alternative symbol or a graph of "reproduction" and said. It is a direct presentation. And, now, the reality can be used to represent meaning. Because of falling into a new dialectical relationship of trap, become the external form of this relation, reality becomes fiction its elements. Two, several points in addition to the above views, some critics, some psychologists say the concept, against the language but I think their objection is wrong as the basis, or at least the language concepts into very narrow vision. Here, as in many cases, everyone just broader concepts into their own professional limits, often refused to consider the characteristics have not noticed. Is often the logicians did not psychologists, psychologist skip logicians, linguists without aesthetician, esthetician no philologist, various critics did not in front of the expert.Obviously, if we adhere to the traditional definition, that language is merely a form of abstract symbols fixed and fixed by means of the movie, so I am afraid it is not a language. But the question whether the film with a specific definition, this is one thing, on the contrary, questioning whether the film is not a language and this definition is not careful, is another matter. Because of this classic definition is defined vocabulary language; this is the definition of linguistics, is not a "logic" definition. The system is totally different from a movie a symbol and symbol. At least it shows this kind of system. A film, this is the first image, is the concrete images of what. This is intended to show the description, and the imaging system, an event or a series of events. However, these images can be selected in accordance with the narrative way are arranged into system; they also comes with a symbol. But the image is not the similar words and symbols, images, is the concrete reality: a self contained (or people which included) define the meaning of the images. In this sense, the film is language; it is the first reproduction, at the same time as the representation language. It can be said that this is the two dimension of language. The film does not appear as abstract form can be added several aesthetic attributes, but appears to be added to the aesthetic attributes of language characteristics of itself; in short, it is an organic whole, on the whole, art and language are combined into a whole, related to each other. In a certain sense, it is a perfect example of Benedetto Croce's theory, Croce thought, aesthetics and linguistics is the same science. He said: "if linguistics is really a kind of aesthetics and the different science, whose research object is not performance, performance is the aesthetic fact in nature. To prove that language is the performance, then it is superfluous...... The scientific problems of linguistics into aesthetic formula is possible...... Philosophy and art philosophy is one thing." 
Catalog
I know that in the translation the translator? Dmitry 
reduced the editor's preface
author introduction
the first chapter
the first festival and the creation of
A, who is a film writer?
two, the production of conventional
three, the production of conventional
four, artist and craftsman
five, the author of the film
six, the author and his works
second movies and language
A, film and language
two,
three, film and literary expression
third words and images.
A, thinking and language
two, lexical and conceptual
three, two languages
four,
second chapter film word representation of image
the first section image itself.
A, general image
two,
three, heart like image as the symbol
four, video images and language expression.
second section image structure.
A, lens and angle
two, frame and its defining elements of
three, participation and identity
third chapter rhythm and montage montage of
the first section
A, origin and development of the
two, Griffith and the Soviet Union each school
three, the Currie Seaan J effect of
second consequences of movie rhythm.
A, the rhythm of
two, avant-garde and pure film
three,
four, rhythm and montage montage form and the theory of
five, montage
fourth chapter psychology rhythm and move the lens
the first day free camera and the depth of field of
A, "non montage" principle and general real
two,
three mobile cameras, mobile camera psychology
four,
five depth of field, the wide screen
six, confusion and alienation of
seven,
eight subjective camera, semi subjective image
nine,
ten oblique image, the film color
second words and sounds.
A, dialogue and the role and significance of
two, the function of music
three,
four, audio-visual structure about the rhythm of the
fifth chapter story time and space
the first exploration of drama art.
A, from the stage comedies to visual representation of a
two, drama and film
three, literature and film
second contents and forms.
A, the theme of the importance and value of
two, the film's art
three, realistic and practical
four, video and Film Semiotics
five,
bibliography @##@ film logic "The classical image series: the main content of movie aesthetics and psychology" include: production routine, the production of conventional, artist and craftsman, the writer of the film, the author and his works, films and film language, and language, several points, the film image and language expression, frame and its limiting elements.
Chapter abstract
"Film aesthetics and psychology" is an insurmountable classics. Christian Mats (French Film Semiotics father ") Dmitry works not only have encyclopedic view, but a collection of classic movie theory elaboration, the formation of a master. Dmitry refined way through two kinds of film theory of realism and formalism of classical position between. Dudley Andrew (Yale University professor of comparative literature and film) contemporary film pioneering sign is an attempt to have clear comprehensive, namely Jean mitry his brilliant masterpiece "film aesthetics and psychology". Jacques allmon (Professor of French film esthetician, third University of Paris) 
Media attention and comments
"Film aesthetics and psychology" by the Jiangsu literature and Art Publishing house. 
Editor recommends
"Film aesthetics and psychology" is an insurmountable classics. Christian Mats (French Film Semiotics father ") Dmitry works not only have encyclopedic view, but a collection of classic movie theory elaboration, the formation of a master. Dmitry refined way through two kinds of film theory of realism and formalism of classical position between. Dudley Andrew (Yale University professor of comparative literature and film) contemporary film pioneering sign is an attempt to have clear comprehensive, namely Jean mitry his brilliant masterpiece "film aesthetics and psychology". Jacques allmon (Professor of French film esthetician, third University of Paris)
Download

Film aesthetics and psychology download

Comments and ratings
  •     The book is the atmosphere. Ha-ha. Can read for a long time. Study hard film theory.
  •     Strongly recommended film students reading, really good.
  •     Husband is very interested in the film!
  •     You see, this book is good. Learn to see the movie
  •     To understand the film is worth reading.
  •     Let Dmitry book theory is strong, is full of dialectical spirit.
  •     Let Dmitry book for a long time, finally published.
  •     Dmitry's book, the book recommended by our teacher, very good book
  •     Good theoretical books to
  •     I feel very good, very good book
  •     Call, didn't see it, look at a few, content slowly digest, is a good book anyway, think a little expensive
  •     Content is not see. But from the quality of the book, paper. The quality of the book is differ in thousands of ways, this should be moderate.
  •     Very practical, class reference, very useful
  •     It is old!!!!!! I was mad, opened it was old, even if the discount also should not give the old bar, cover break so, really disappointed. Feeling for many years did not sell out!
  •     The book surface traces of white, looks a bit old, there are still intact, writing for me some difficult ah, sometimes read two or three pages, do not know what is said, but still have to bite the bullet and see
  •     Very thick book, you need to have patience to look carefully, there will be harvested
  •     My daughter wants to learn language professional, have a look to her.
  •     Hope is a good book
  •     Recommended reading tutor
  •     Very good, can not go beyond the classic!
  •     To help colleagues to buy, and he was very satisfied, beauty is very rich and interesting.
  •     Masterpiece, but some express or feel uncomfortable.
  •     Film aesthetics and psychology,, help more buyers. Share, make the world a better place (
  •     I think this book is old, because in addition to professional learning theory of film of people will watch the doings of ghosts and gods, but I bought, I think movies and psychology on my bidirectional effects.
  •     Culture of film criticism must read books!
  •     A good movie tool book
  •     For a long time, must be. But what is the translation, the original three Jumbo? Unfortunately.
  •     Well, the book did not see it, should be genuine.
  •     Haven't seen, fast delivery, but the book corner was crushed. Also does not affect the reading.
  •     This book would not have said what. A good book, film and television must see. Read a few times, there will be a big harvest.
  •     Before he could see the hope to buy lots of good!
  •     The cover is damaged. The logistics of the time.
  •     Belongs to the good of the type, and is compared with the other similar terms
  •     The analysis of "film aesthetics", is obviously not as good as Barzun Krakauer, deep and profound.
  •     The book is the new version, is a little expensive, not how much of a discount, not very lively, a bit boring...... Ha-ha
  •     The cover of the book was printed "marks", the side also have scratches, inside the footer is also wrinkly, can't give me a good point of it, could almost do, because it is Zhengzhou to Kaifeng, logistics fast, look carefully the contents inside, buy karma.
  •     Well, look, someone recommended book.
  •     Film aesthetics theory book great, movie people!
  •     Before reading a book, the translator, written in very good, don't know what to buy this, get the calligraphy paper quality did not have to say, but may be more professional, or to learn the art of boyfriend.
  •     A friend recommended, theory book, to read slowly.
  •     Bridge between classical film theory and modern film theory
  •     Text in some places very jerky,, to focus much energy to read
  •     Absolute classic, film critics read.
  •     Quality paper only storyteller is too poor. Contents differ from man to man.
  •     Translation is not good, the general usefulness........
  •     Compared to Yu Bo Deweier a couple of books, I think this book is better. Demetrius is the film as an art to treat, Americans are more focused on the technical level. This is the book which deeply classic.